10 Comments
User's avatar
Sylov's avatar

Excellent idea, thanks for sharing. Net net with great possible tailwinds.

Expand full comment
Stockdrifts Research's avatar

How good do you think their tech really is when compared to BE? I keep hearing their tech is subpar. INterested on having a conversation about it.

Expand full comment
Stock Pursuit's avatar

I'm far from being well versed in thermodynamics or electrochemistry. My research found the electrical efficiency is very similar to Bloom but slightly less. Blooms I believe is upper 50% lifetime efficiency vs FCEL 43-44% lifetime.

FCEL has only been doing it since 2023 commercially and they say they can increase the output to 80 MW already.

It looks like FuelCell has a shorter lifespan of 7 years vs 10 Boom and degrades a little faster vs Bloom.

Fuelcell platform

"This platform is a 250 kW power generation module

enabling 80% combined heat and power efficiency.

This module can be powered by different sources

including natural gas, biogas, hydrogen or blends and

maintains the potential to use 100% pure hydrogen for

the best efficiencies and environmental impact.

Solid Oxide-Based Electrolysis Platform

This platform can deliver up to 600 kg hydrogen

per day using 1.1 MW power input. It operates at

up to 90% HHV electrical efficiency, which can

be increased to 100% HHV efficiency when using

external heat input as part of the power source."

https://www.fuelcellenergy.com/hubfs/fuelcell-energy-2023-sustainability-report.pdf

Expand full comment
Stock Pursuit's avatar

I like Net Power NPWR for more near-term scale. The CEO on an old conference call has said they can work for hyperscalers. They are already doing utility size scale

Expand full comment
Stockdrifts Research's avatar

Gotta check them out. Very interesting idea.

Expand full comment
Stockdrifts Research's avatar

Did you check this tweet of mine from 2 weeks ago. This is a pretty savage number.

https://x.com/hiteshkar/status/1978141787609837953

Ofcoruse it's since 2003, but its gotta be very interesting. Would you like to hop on a call?

Expand full comment
Stock Pursuit's avatar

https://www.fuelcellenergy.com/blog/fuel-cell-scalability

This says they can integrate with battery storage and solar too. In theory it is scalable.

Expand full comment
Stockdrifts Research's avatar

How is their ramp time? can they respond quick enough under a minute or under 20 seconds? I think the BE tech is faster. I couldnt find this data easily. Do you wanna write to the CEO if he would do a podcast with you? You are a big account so maybe he will be interested.

Expand full comment
Stock Pursuit's avatar

I found an actual Fuel Cell source with Perplexity Pro. It's 20 years old though. I'm not interested in podcasts. I'm not really a podcast kind of guy. I don't know enough about their technology or the industry to ask questions on fly

Fast load recovery capability: FuelCell Energy successfully demonstrated rapid load return on full-size Stack FA-100-3 with ramp rates up to 150 A/min, achieving 90% of rated load in less than 5 minutes. During testing, the stack ramped from 20 mA/cm² to 110 mA/cm² (90% load) in under 5 minutes, with the final increase from 110 to 120 mA/cm² conducted at a slower 3 A/min rate over 26 minutes.​

Typical ramp rates: Earlier MCFC demonstrations reported ramp rates of approximately 0.08% of rated power per second (equivalent to about 0.2 kW/s for a 250 kW system, or roughly 5% per minute). Design targets allowed ramping at around 150 A/min per stack to reach approximately 90% load in under 5 minutes from part-load conditions.​

Product specifications: FuelCell Energy's commercial DFC systems are designed for ramping to rated power in 5 minutes from standby conditions. For the King County installation, the design ramp rate was 2 kW per minute with a slower cold-start ramp of 0.5 kW per minute.​

Operational Constraints

Load step capability: Stack FA-100-2 demonstrated the ability to handle instantaneous load fluctuations of 35% at 200 kW and 50% at 150 kW power levels for short durations (5 seconds or less) without process adjustment. For grid disruptions lasting longer than 5 seconds, fuel flow adjustment ("fuel following") is required to manage anode exhaust oxidizer temperatures.​

Thermal management limits: While the electrochemical response of MCFC stacks is inherently

Expand full comment
Stockdrifts Research's avatar

I have perplexity pro too and I know about this. The problem is that this source was 20 years ago. Nothing in here is valuable insight to me. We gotta refresh our knowledge about this tech.

Expand full comment